Porque Linus não usa Debian?
37. Re: Porque Linus não usa Debian?
netr0n
(usa KUbuntu)
Enviado em 18/02/2016 - 17:12h
luiztux escreveu:
Permita-me discordar de você.
Olhe a famosa mensagem do mesmo na época da criação do Kernel:
Ele já sabia que o GNU era uma ótima opção de escolha, tanto que trabalhou em cima de suas ferramentas para tornar o Kernel um sonho realizado. Não é porque as ferramentas eram apenas boas, mas porque permitiam que ele construísse qualquer coisa com elas. E assim o fez.
-----------------------------------''----------------------------------
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
netr0n escreveu:
Acho que ele só usou o GNU porque era o que tinha de melhor na época.
Veja as declarações dele nessa entrevista: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-35599774
"I did not start Linux as a collaborative project, I started it for myself. I needed the end result but I also enjoyed programming," he said.
"I made it publicly available but I had no intention to use the open-source methodology, I just wanted to have comments on the work."
Acho que ele só usou o GNU porque era o que tinha de melhor na época.
Veja as declarações dele nessa entrevista: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-35599774
"I did not start Linux as a collaborative project, I started it for myself. I needed the end result but I also enjoyed programming," he said.
"I made it publicly available but I had no intention to use the open-source methodology, I just wanted to have comments on the work."
Permita-me discordar de você.
Olhe a famosa mensagem do mesmo na época da criação do Kernel:
Hello everybody out there using minix
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work.
This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and
I'd like to know what features most people would want. Any suggestions
are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-)
Linus (torvalds@kruuna.helsinki.fi)
PS. Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs.
It is NOT portable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never
will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(.
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work.
This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and
I'd like to know what features most people would want. Any suggestions
are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-)
Linus (torvalds@kruuna.helsinki.fi)
PS. Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs.
It is NOT portable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never
will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(.
Ele já sabia que o GNU era uma ótima opção de escolha, tanto que trabalhou em cima de suas ferramentas para tornar o Kernel um sonho realizado. Não é porque as ferramentas eram apenas boas, mas porque permitiam que ele construísse qualquer coisa com elas. E assim o fez.
-----------------------------------''----------------------------------
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Eu quis dizer que o Linus esolheu o GNU mais por conveniência do que por ideologia. Ele nunca foi muito engajado.