Nao Consigo Definir Repositorio Pois Nao Tenho Editor De Texto

1. Nao Consigo Definir Repositorio Pois Nao Tenho Editor De Texto

Lucas Juliao
dyronnolis

(usa Kali)

Enviado em 03/03/2017 - 19:31h

Galera eu nao to conseguindo instalar nada no meu kali pq eu instalei ele no hd mas ele +e a versao Kali Ligth e nao tem leaf pad gedit nem nada do tipo.E agr como instalar o leafpad?


  


2. Re: Nao Consigo Definir Repositorio Pois Nao Tenho Editor De Texto

Guilherme
Ghost_Shell

(usa Arch Linux)

Enviado em 03/03/2017 - 19:33h

dyronnolis escreveu:

Galera eu nao to conseguindo instalar nada no meu kali pq eu instalei ele no hd mas ele +e a versao Kali Ligth e nao tem leaf pad gedit nem nada do tipo.E agr como instalar o leafpad?


Rsrsrs, já tentou o nano Mr? Eu aposto com você que ele está ai.

Keep it simple stupid!


3. Re: Nao Consigo Definir Repositorio Pois Nao Tenho Editor De Texto

Perfil removido
removido

(usa Nenhuma)

Enviado em 03/03/2017 - 19:44h

Se não tiver nano tente o vim...
Digito, logo existo!



4. Re: Nao Consigo Definir Repositorio Pois Nao Tenho Editor De Texto

Paulo
paulo1205

(usa Ubuntu)

Enviado em 03/03/2017 - 19:52h

Ed is the standard text editor! (cf. http://cs.wellesley.edu/~systems/Resources/ed_is_the_standard_text_editor.html)

  From: patl@athena.mit.edu (Patrick J. LoPresti?)
Message-ID: <1991Jul11.031731.9260@athena.mit.edu>
Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
Subject: The True Path (long)
Date: 11 Jul 91 03:17:31 GMT
Path: ai-lab!mintaka!olivea!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!patl
Newsgroups: alt.religion.emacs,alt.slack
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lines: 95
Xref: ai-lab alt.religion.emacs:244 alt.slack:1935

When I log into my Xenix system with my 110 baud teletype, both vi
*and* Emacs are just too damn slow. They print useless messages like,
'C-h for help' and '"foo" File is read only'. So I use the editor
that doesn't waste my VALUABLE time.

Ed, man! !man ed

ED(1) UNIX Programmer's Manual ED(1)

NAME
ed - text editor

SYNOPSIS
ed [ - ] [ -x ] [ name ]
DESCRIPTION
Ed is the standard text editor.
---

Computer Scientists love ed, not just because it comes first
alphabetically, but because it's the standard. Everyone else loves ed
because it's ED!

"Ed is the standard text editor."

And ed doesn't waste space on my Timex Sinclair. Just look:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 24 Oct 29 1929 /bin/ed
-rwxr-xr-t 4 root 1310720 Jan 1 1970 /usr/ucb/vi
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 5.89824e37 Oct 22 1990 /usr/bin/emacs

Of course, on the system *I* administrate, vi is symlinked to ed.
Emacs has been replaced by a shell script which 1) Generates a syslog
message at level LOG_EMERG; 2) reduces the user's disk quota by 100K;
and 3) RUNS ED!!!!!!

"Ed is the standard text editor."

Let's look at a typical novice's session with the mighty ed:

golem> ed

?
help
?
?
?
quit
?
exit
?
bye
?
hello?
?
eat flaming death
?
^C
?
^C
?
^D
?

---
Note the consistent user interface and error reportage. Ed is
generous enough to flag errors, yet prudent enough not to overwhelm
the novice with verbosity.

"Ed is the standard text editor."

Ed, the greatest WYGIWYG editor of all.

ED IS THE TRUE PATH TO NIRVANA! ED HAS BEEN THE CHOICE OF EDUCATED
AND IGNORANT ALIKE FOR CENTURIES! ED WILL NOT CORRUPT YOUR PRECIOUS
BODILY FLUIDS!! ED IS THE STANDARD TEXT EDITOR! ED MAKES THE SUN
SHINE AND THE BIRDS SING AND THE GRASS GREEN!!

When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless
help screens and cursor positioning code! I just want an EDitor!!
Not a "viitor". Not a "emacsitor". Those aren't even WORDS!!!! ED!
ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!

TEXT EDITOR.

When IBM, in its ever-present omnipotence, needed to base their
"edlin" on a UNIX standard, did they mimic vi? No. Emacs? Surely
you jest. They chose the most karmic editor of all. The standard.

Ed is for those who can *remember* what they are working on. If you
are an idiot, you should use Emacs. If you are an Emacs, you should
not be vi. If you use ED, you are on THE PATH TO REDEMPTION. THE
SO-CALLED "VISUAL" EDITORS HAVE BEEN PLACED HERE BY ED TO TEMPT THE
FAITHLESS. DO NOT GIVE IN!!! THE MIGHTY ED HAS SPOKEN!!!

?



5. Re: Nao Consigo Definir Repositorio Pois Nao Tenho Editor De Texto

Paulo
paulo1205

(usa Ubuntu)

Enviado em 03/03/2017 - 19:58h

Em tempo, Kali não foi feito para ser desktop. A própria documentação dele diz isso.

Se você quer um Linux para desktop, tente alguma variação de Ubuntu, Fedora ou openSUSE.






Patrocínio

Site hospedado pelo provedor RedeHost.
Linux banner

Destaques

Artigos

Dicas

Tópicos

Top 10 do mês

Scripts